<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for wuetender-junger-mann.de</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress</link>
	<description>Der Freiheit eine Gasse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:49:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Processing large XML files with Shell Scripts by felix</title>
		<link>http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/2011/01/processing-large-xml-files-with-shell-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-75073</link>
		<dc:creator>felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/?p=1122#comment-75073</guid>
		<description>Hi Stefan,

the files we processed where considerable smaller, around 500MB. I was also under the impression, that performance depends on the complexity of your query. Perhaps you can try to simplify your query. For the more complex stuff I had to write some code using the java streaming api for xml.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stefan,</p>
<p>the files we processed where considerable smaller, around 500MB. I was also under the impression, that performance depends on the complexity of your query. Perhaps you can try to simplify your query. For the more complex stuff I had to write some code using the java streaming api for xml.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Processing large XML files with Shell Scripts by Stefan Meier</title>
		<link>http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/2011/01/processing-large-xml-files-with-shell-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-75065</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Meier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 02:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/?p=1122#comment-75065</guid>
		<description>How big are the files you have processed successfully in this fashion? I&#039;m trying to query against a 19.5GB XML file and xqilla hogs memory without end and then just swaps endlessly.

- Stefan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How big are the files you have processed successfully in this fashion? I&#8217;m trying to query against a 19.5GB XML file and xqilla hogs memory without end and then just swaps endlessly.</p>
<p>- Stefan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scala Compiler Quirks by toni</title>
		<link>http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/2011/09/scala-compiler-quirks/comment-page-1/#comment-74458</link>
		<dc:creator>toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wuetender-junger-mann.de/wordpress/?p=1184#comment-74458</guid>
		<description>Man, imagine how more you could do with ruby.. 
No I am joking not in the mood to suggest ruby these days with all the mess that bundle, rvm are creating. 

I had hopes in scala, even if it&#039;s not liked over here (the main argument is that you can&#039;t write idiomatic code, cos you can be either functional or OO or a mix of the two). But these bugs are a bit scary. 

Just wait for java 10.. they will port one day the scala features there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, imagine how more you could do with ruby..<br />
No I am joking not in the mood to suggest ruby these days with all the mess that bundle, rvm are creating. </p>
<p>I had hopes in scala, even if it&#8217;s not liked over here (the main argument is that you can&#8217;t write idiomatic code, cos you can be either functional or OO or a mix of the two). But these bugs are a bit scary. </p>
<p>Just wait for java 10.. they will port one day the scala features there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

